Sunday, December 12, 2010
The "assholes" of the CANCUN summit and do not forget the "Canad[i]a[n] very deeply hypocritical politics"...!
The "assholes" of the CANCUN summit and do not forget the "Canada very deeply hypocritical politics"...!
WITH JOHN BAIRD AT THE HEAD OR THE COMMONLY refered to kindly by all "the rhino"...!
Climate-change reputation in tatters?
Try blustering JEFFREY SIMPSON Columnist profile E-mail
From Saturday's Globe and Mail
Published Saturday, Dec. 11, 2010 5:00AM EST
Last updated Saturday, Dec. 11, 2010 7:30AM EST
441 comments Email Print/License Decrease text size
A theory of sports suggests that a good offence is the best defence. It’s a theory the Harper government has put into practice all week around the environment.
With the Cancun climate-change summit approaching, the Harperites knew that, once again, Canada would be pilloried on the world stage. Sure enough, on Day 1, before part-time Environment Minister John Baird arrived, Canada once again was awarded Fossil of the Year, finishing first, second and third in a vote of 500 environmental groups worldwide.
More related to this story
•A convenient excuse for climate inaction
•Can environmentalism be saved from itself?
Proper grammar ... please! Still, some kind of public-relations strategy had to be developed. True to personal form, and consistent with the government’s overall PR approach, Mr. Baird went immediately on the offensive. Before leaving for Cancun, he announced – or, more properly, announced once again – the creation of a marine conservation area in Lancaster Sound off Baffin Island. After all, some sort of environmentally friendly announcement had to be made, or made again, before the drubbing began in Cancun.
Even before his departure, Mr. Baird began blaming China, India, Brazil and others for not doing nearly enough to bring down greenhouse-gas emissions. It was largely the fault of developing countries such as these that the Kyoto Protocol failed, he claimed, and why a new climate-change agreement wouldn’t work.
Canada is right to urge big developing countries to do better and more than what they’ve thus far proposed. Canada also would be right to do something serious itself before lecturing others, since Canada has the worst record in the advanced industrialized world.
Mr. Baird’s aggressive message – a classic instance of throwing stones at glass houses – was designed entirely for Canadian consumption, since Canada long ago lost any shred of credibility on the world stage for climate change.
Not only did Canada manifestly fail to meet emission reduction targets set by a previous (Liberal) government, no one who knows the climate-change file believes in the Harper government’s reduction target – a 17-per-cent decline from 2005 levels by 2020.
Mr. Baird claimed Canadian emissions had fallen 2 per cent in 2009 – true, but almost entirely due to the recession, not government policies. For Canada to reach the Harper government’s 2020 target, emissions would have to fall by 1.5 per cent each year for a decade – something that has never happened. Moreover, it’s impossible for Canada’s overall emissions to fall by 17 per cent while Alberta’s rise by 14 per cent, as anticipated by the provincial government.
The world understands this. It knows Canada is deeply hypocritical when it criticizes others, because Canada, as one of the world’s largest per capita emitters, attends every climate-change meeting with dirty hands, empty rhetoric and inadequate policies. It knows the Harper government doesn’t like the climate-change file, wants desperately to protect the oil and gas industries, and doesn’t believe there’s a single vote in climate-change action.
No one at Cancun would pay serious attention to Mr. Baird. His bluster was intended for domestic consumption, to reassure those Canadians – many of whom are lodged in the Conservative Party and the media’s right-wing elements – who want no action taken against climate change
...NOBODY in their "right sound minds" would defend "crude oil and gas" industries, unless they really plan on "using up " all this crucial emergency source of ENERGY...!
...WHAT WORK ARE THEY GOING TO SUPPLY WHEN OIL AND GAS IS ALL USED UP ?
.UNLESS we all go to pure logic work and production...!