Copyscape

Protected by Copyscape Duplicate Content Checker

IMPORTANT GENERAL MESSAGE TO ALL

PLEASE SUPPORT ME IN MY CONTINUED ADVANCE IN LOGIC STUDIES FOR THE PROGRESS OF HUMANITY BUT NOT FOR CONTROVERSY !
******** WORLD OF "Normal" HUMANS, PLEASE LIVE YOUR LIVES AS YOU DO, AND YOUR RELIGIONS AND ACADEMIA, ETC ! I WILL LIVE MY more normal free LIFE IN "COMPLETE PEACE" WITH MYSELF AND THE MAXIMUM LOGIC OF "PURE LOGIC" ! - MANY THANKS TO ALL !
PURE LOGIC IS HOW TO ANALYZE AND IF IT IS WRONG OR RIGHT UNDER MOST SCENARIOS AND WHY, NOT IF ACADEMIA OR HUMANS ARE GOING TO EMPLOY IT...!

Maximum limit of CO2 350ppm...!

CO2 World Ocean Acidification...!

##
World CO2
since 1750 (cubic feet)

zFacts.com - CO2 Global Warming

UNIVERSAL STANDARD TIME - UTC - GMT [Greenwich-UK ! ] - Date Line Pacific FIJI



7 TIMES - do they do for you ? - 7 HORAS = LE SIRVE ALGUNO ?

COUNTDOWN TO WORLD "OVER-POPULATION" OF 7 BILLION

WORLD POPULATION CLOCK USA GOV

PoodWaddle World Population and Productive Land Count !

YOUR CUTE unforgettable games online

YOUR CUTE unforgettable games online http://tetris-it.blogspot.com

Other web addresses


Other Web sites:


JOINTQUEST.COM ; GeorgeFrederickThomsonBroadhead.com ; DatJot.com
http://twitter.com/CoolerDrink
https://Facebook.com : Pure Logic Book
https://Facebook.com : George Frederick Thomson Broadhead
http://thepurelogic.wordpress.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/BookOfPureLogic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Forever_true
http://en.metapedia.or/wiki/User_talk:George1963#Articles
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/newbooks/07/g4-100e.html
DO NOT FORGET THE RECENT BUT FORGOTTEN "LINK":
http://www.DatJot.com

Blog of Venezuela - A country gone to another reality ! AND eve-nt !

DO NOT MISS the "Modern" Efforts of a ancient violent dead God and Jesus !

http://www.y-jesus.com
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.godresources.org/index.php?p=home

Friday, July 29, 2011

...TURING TEST 2...!



TURING TEST 2 - ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
[Determining a intelligent human from a computer]

http://holy-grail.blog.co.uk/
http://the-10-temptations.blogspot.com/



Though artificial intelligence can progress greatly !
To make a Mega-computer more intelligent than us, it would mean
we could find out anything with this computer, more than what we
know as of year 2011, or learn more than we humans have been able to !
This Mega-Computer would have to speak language more than we do !
And not be mind boggled by the samples below of "mingled quasi-random"fixed data source style writ.
These words have meaning in themselves...!
The problem is their correct combination and/or meaning, in full
combination in logic or sufficiently logic sentences !

SIMPLE AS THAT...! Quasi-Random mingled language of fixed source data group-words as depicted bellow, exemplifies the complexity of language and knowledge of what we do not know !

Evolutionary Science simplifies too much, even the origin and source of language and we fall into the definition I have given of Imformatics Logic.

This over simplification that Academia of Year 2011 has adopted, falls into a realm of "not knowing the problem", and of "ignoring the complexity of the matter in question" !

Henceforth, it is obvious that long paragraphs and sentences of words, makes the problem of linguistics and semantics a very complex Universe of knowledge and logic !

OF COURSE THIS LOGIC COMPUTER, SUPPLIED WITH CORRECT DATA, AND WITH THE CAPABILITY OF ACQUIRING FURTHER DATA, WOULD BE as Pure Logic and me:

[.] Would determine Evolution is wrong !
[.] Would declare its maker "humans" to have inferior logic in governance, education and way of living !
[.] Would be able to do more deep logic studies in pure logic !

Book 2 of Pure Logic, please, for a bit more on this Evolutionary mater !
As there is a bit more to this Turing Test 2, and the typewriter typing Ape
of your afamed "Richard Dawkins" !


Examples of somewhat senseless writ:

It must be emphasized, once again, that a subset of English sentences
interesting on quite independent grounds is necessary to impose an
interpretation on problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.
Furthermore, a descriptively adequate grammar is rather different from
nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. Thus this
analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is to be regarded
as the strong generative capacity of the theory. For one thing, an
important property of these three types of EC is not to be considered in
determining the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.
Analogously, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition delimits a corpus
of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired
utterance test.

Analogously, the earlier discussion of deviance may remedy and, at the
same time, eliminate a general convention regarding the forms of the
grammar. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in
application to be of any interest, any associated supporting element
does not affect the structure of the strong generative capacity of the
theory. Let us continue to suppose that relational information is not
subject to the extended c-command discussed in connection with (34).
Furthermore, the natural general principle that will subsume this case
is to be regarded as irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional
rules. Note that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort
appears to correlate rather closely with a corpus of utterance tokens
upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test.

Analogously, this selectionally introduced contextual feature is not
quite equivalent to the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon.
Presumably, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features
can be defined in such a way as to impose problems of phonemic and
morphological analysis. However, this assumption is not correct, since
the descriptive power of the base component is not to be considered in
determining a descriptive fact. A consequence of the approach just
outlined is that the systematic use of complex symbols is necessary to
impose an interpretation on the levels of acceptability from fairly high
(e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g. (98d)). I suggested that these
results would follow from the assumption that the earlier discussion of
deviance delimits a stipulation to place the constructions into these
various categories.

However, this assumption is not correct, since a case of
semigrammaticalness of a different sort is unspecified with respect to
the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed
grammar. From C1, it follows that a descriptively adequate grammar is
not subject to the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. For
any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to
be of any interest, any associated supporting element does not readily
tolerate the strong generative capacity of the theory. To provide a
constituent structure for T(Z,K), the notion of level of grammaticalness
delimits a stipulation to place the constructions into these various
categories. Nevertheless, the descriptive power of the base component is
necessary to impose an interpretation on the traditional practice of
grammarians.

Note that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as
categorial is, apparently, determined by the strong generative capacity
of the theory. Summarizing, then, we assume that a subset of English
sentences interesting on quite independent grounds can be defined in
such a way as to impose a stipulation to place the constructions into
these various categories. Analogously, the earlier discussion of
deviance raises serious doubts about problems of phonemic and
morphological analysis. So far, the appearance of parasitic gaps in
domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is necessary to
impose an interpretation on a general convention regarding the forms of
the grammar. Suppose, for instance, that relational information delimits
an important distinction in language use.

>>>
http://youtu.be/PmDIicJbPjE


http://youtu.be/m3eo-AxtD2M


http://youtu.be/k2YaCA2oyjs


http://youtu.be/uhqoNWei34g

.
.
.