Thursday, September 1, 2011
...NO PROBLEM AT ALL WITH THE USE OF ".org" for the sale and copyright of a BOOK !
NO PROBLEM WITH THIS "BOOK" BEING ".ORG" - SO EQUALLY PAY FOR MY BOOK OF PURE LOGIC ALL YOU THAT ALLEGEDLY HAVE READ IT AND/OR COPIED IT
CAUSALITY - Judea Pearl
Cambridge University Press - Cambridge.org
Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference [Hardcover]
Hardcover: 484 pages
Publisher: Cambridge University Press; 2nd edition (September 14, 2009)
Product Dimensions: 10.1 x 7.1 x 1.2 inches
...I BOUGHT THIS BOOK RECENTLY IN YEAR 2010...!
THIS BOOK COSTS 40.11$ us...!
...AND THIS BOOK WAS NOT READ BEFORE THE WRIT OF THE BOOK OF PURE LOGIC !
THIS BOOK IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE BOOK OF PURE LOGIC !
...TO ALL THAT HAVE DIS-CREDITED ME, AND THOUGHT I HAD COMMITTED "A BLUNDER" FOR USING THE COMBINATION OF .COM WITH .ORG [as copyright-for non-copying as background and on my bar-code], MAKING MY BOOK SUPPOSEDLY "OPEN SOURCE", ARE COMPLETELY WRONG...!
PLEASE PAY UP ...!
To mention some writ for Book 2 I make reference to some first mentioned terminology of Judea Pearl:
Page 1. The why of probabilities ?
"re- written to my understanding...!":
'''Causality connotes lawlike necessity, whereas probabilities connote exceptionality, doubt , and lack of regularity.
To the contrary of simplistic absurd "Evolutionist" and the quite ignorant Richard Dawkins, as also most of the illogic Bible, probabilities has a use to express uncertainty about unobserved facts. It helps causality to focus on the main issues without having to cope with paradoxes of the possible non-exactness of language in general.
The subtle reason of inexactness, concerns the fact that even the most assertive causal expressions in natural language are subject to exceptions, and those exceptions may cause major difficulties if processed by standard rules of deterministic logic.
Probability theory, aided by methods of statistical analysis, provides both the principles and the means of coping with - and drawing inferences from - such observations. '''
Pure logic and my first Book, emphatically denotes mater to be governed by "causality", and that probabilities rightly used, denote particular "complexity-difficulty" and thus exceptionality !
That for advanced pure logic inference, we cannot see the general picture solely but also the particular exceptional one or ones.
Exceptionally causality and probability need observation and can be used clearly and correctly for what is not observable or not so observable ! Now this does not infer what Science catalogues as impossible in the colloquial definition of "super-natural" . Pure logic defines it well as infra and supra-natural !
Additionally causality does not require or demand in itself the end of an endless regressive loop or other loops, in deductions and inferences, unless they be proven logically to have an end, or require it !
"""AS TO THE USE OF "GRANULARITY" OF NATURAL LANGUAGE. I MUST ADD THAT I WOULD USE RATHER A FEW OTHER TERMINOLOGIES LIKE: non-specific; non-absolute; too short a paragraph; etc...!
...thank you very much for all your recognition and "damage" so far...! And R>C>M>P and Gov. of Canada "ignominy"...!
Book 2 please !